Last week, as part of a major shake-up of the federal government’s enforcement agencies, President Trump made three major changes to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), all of which will cause a major shift in the political leanings of the EEOC. One of those changes, the firing of EEOC General Counsel Karla Gilbride, was expected. The other changes, the firing of EEOC Commissioners Charlotte Burrows and Jocelyn Samuels, were unexpected and unprecedented.

President Trump’s firing of Gilbride will have the most immediate effect and has been established as within presidential authority. As a result, Gilbride is not expected to challenge her termination. Although her replacement has not yet been named, this action ends her authority over management and coordination of EEOC enforcement litigation, which had been aggressively pursuing various employers and implementing the Biden administration’s agenda nationwide. It is expected that Gilbride’s termination will dramatically alter the EEOC’s enforcement priorities, including which lawsuits are filed by the EEOC and what actions (or inactions) are taken in charge investigations.   

President Trump’s firing of Burrows and Samuels, two of the three remaining Democrat EEOC Commissioners, on the other hand, was largely unexpected. This action was unprecedented, and most likely will face court challenge(s). Both Commissioners have stated they are exploring legal options. For the time being, Burrows’ and Samuels’ removals leave the five-member board with only two members: Commissioner Andrea Lucas, who President Trump has designated as Acting Chair, and Commissioner Kalpana Kotagal, a President Biden appointee. Since the EEOC no longer has the requisite three-member quorum, the EEOC cannot decide cases. Thus, these terminations prevent the EEOC, which had a majority of three Democrat Commissioners to one Republican Commissioner before President Trump’s actions, from issuing any additional decisions or guidance that could be contrary to President Trump’s agenda. Until President Trump appoints, and the Senate confirms new EEOC Commissioners, the EEOC will remain unable to issue rulings or guidance, absent a successful court challenge that reinstates these Commissioners.

Importantly, upon her appointment as Acting Chair, Lucas issued the following statement:

“Consistent with the President’s Executive Orders and priorities, my priorities will include rooting out unlawful DEI-motivated race and sex discrimination; protecting American workers from anti-American national origin discrimination; defending the biological and binary reality of sex and related rights, including women’s rights to single‑sex spaces at work; protecting workers from religious bias and harassment, including antisemitism; and remedying other areas of recent under-enforcement.”

This statement provides employers with a taste of where the EEOC will focus its enforcement efforts once it has the requisite three-member quorum. Wise employers will remember, however, that many States have their own enforcement agencies, that enforce State anti-discrimination laws, and it is very possible that some (if not many) of those States will continue enforcement efforts similar to those of the Biden EEOC.

If you have any questions about how these changes to the EEOC’s composition and priorities may impact your business, please contact the authors.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Tim K. Garrett Tim K. Garrett

Tim Garrett helps employers solve complex issues related to all aspects of labor and employment law, providing in depth counseling and developing creative solutions to underlying business issues. He is an experienced trial lawyer, defending employers of all sizes in employment litigation claims…

Tim Garrett helps employers solve complex issues related to all aspects of labor and employment law, providing in depth counseling and developing creative solutions to underlying business issues. He is an experienced trial lawyer, defending employers of all sizes in employment litigation claims across the country. His work has ranged from defending a major university during a significant wage and hour collective action involving thousands of employees to the successful defense of a major healthcare provider in a gender discrimination / retaliation case. In addition, Tim has served as nationwide labor and employment counsel for the largest nonprofit dialysis company in the U.S.

Photo of Hunter K. Yoches Hunter K. Yoches

Hunter Yoches represents management in all aspects of labor and employment law and related litigation.  He regularly defends employers against various claims and counsels clients on a wide range of day-to-day employment matters. Hunter has experience litigating cases and counseling clients regarding federal…

Hunter Yoches represents management in all aspects of labor and employment law and related litigation.  He regularly defends employers against various claims and counsels clients on a wide range of day-to-day employment matters. Hunter has experience litigating cases and counseling clients regarding federal and state employment laws, including collective and class action litigation, contract disputes, and compliance issues. He advises clients related to wage and hour laws (such as the Fair Labor Standards Act), discrimination laws (such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Family and Medical Leave Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and others), unfair labor practices (such as the National Labor Relations Act), and more, helping employers remain compliant with the constantly changing laws and regulations that impact the workplace.